As global languages vanish and oral traditions fade, new AI tools offer a lifeline, capturing and revitalizing cultural knowledge before it’s lost forever. From Māori revival to African American speech tech, these tools are reshaping how heritage is honored and passed on.
Book: AI for CommunityPreserving Culture and Tradition. Image Credit: Vitalii Vodolazskyi / Shutterstock
Promising new AI tools are being developed to protect and preserve the cultural traditions and heritage of marginalized or indigenous communities, including language, folklore, oral traditions, and community wisdom.
These advances have prompted industry experts to highlight the potential for culturally aware AI systems, ensuring unique traditions are remembered, shared, and reimagined across generations.
However, experts say that to continue this positive trend, tech companies must ensure that the AI-based systems they develop are representative and build bridges across cultures.
In the forthcoming book AI for Community, a group of technologists, researchers, and cultural advocates explore how AI can preserve heritages that might otherwise be at risk of being lost. The authors highlight how AI can help carry forward traditions across generations when built in collaboration with communities.
“This technology is opening up new ways to capture and share cultural knowledge,” says co-author and AI strategist Iran Davar Ardalan. “We’re seeing AI used to record endangered languages, create interactive learning tools, and even preserve oral histories, offering people new ways to connect with their roots. That kind of connection can inspire pride, belonging, and new creative expression.”
She adds, “From Austin to Aberdeen and Athens to Adelaide, every region holds its own wisdom. These are passed down through lullabies, idioms, recipes, and stories. When AI is informed by these traditions, it does more than process information. It helps carry forward what communities already know and live by. By grounding AI in local context, we can create smarter, more adaptable products that truly meet the needs of the people who use them.”
Protecting language
The authors encourage AI developers to think beyond functionality and consider how the systems they build can reflect different cultural roots, traditions, and values. Rather than applying a one-size-fits-all approach, the multicultural team of authors urges technologists to work closely with cultural experts and communities to develop tools that can adapt to each community's regional traditions and perspectives.
One example is the collaboration between Howard University and Google, and the creation of speech datasets representing African American Vernacular. Though these datasets haven’t yet been integrated into products, these resources offer huge potential for improving voice recognition systems for African American people and ensuring the systems respond accurately.
AI has also been developed to protect native languages at risk of extinction. UNESCO estimates that 3,000 languages are in danger of completely disappearing within the next century – the equivalent of one every two weeks.
A language that is at-risk is Māori, but Te Hiku Media in New Zealand has developed a pioneering AI model to preserve and revitalize the language. Built by Māori technologists, the software aims to ensure that Māori remains a living language in the face of increasing globalization and the dominance of English.
Challenges of AI
AI for Community also examines the challenges that can arise when cultural content is processed by AI tools that lack the right context. For example, facial recognition systems have shown inconsistencies across different populations, and image generators have occasionally misrepresented homes, traditions, or attire. These issues underscore the need for tools to be shaped by people who understand the nuances of the cultures involved.
AI for Community says AI holds promise for the future of language and linguistics. There are challenges to overcome, such as ChatGPT language outputs, which are described as ‘stilted’. In addition, the authors suggest there is a risk that revived languages become AI creations, not a continuation of the historical form.