AI Enhances Non-Destructive Testing in Concrete Engineering

A new AI-powered framework combining ground penetrating radar with deep learning is revolutionizing how engineers assess concrete structures, delivering rapid and highly accurate rebar detection without causing damage.

Research: Integrated ground penetrating radar and deep learning approach for rebar diameter classification in concrete elements. Image Credit: Andrew Angelov  / Shutterstock

Research: Integrated ground penetrating radar and deep learning approach for rebar diameter classification in concrete elements. Image Credit: Andrew Angelov  / Shutterstock

With the development of civil and infrastructure engineering, the inspection and evaluation of reinforced concrete quality have become increasingly crucial. Traditional evaluation methods for reinforced rebar in concrete elements are primarily destructive, which can damage the building structure and have limitations in terms of efficiency and accuracy. However, the integration of non-destructive testing techniques and artificial intelligence has provided new solutions for rebar detection. The application of deep learning models in improving the accuracy and efficiency of rebar diameter classification still requires in-depth exploration.

Research Collaboration at Cairo University

Therefore, Mostafa KHEDR, Mahmoud METAWIE, and Mohamed MARZOUK from the Faculty of Engineering, Cairo University, Egypt, have jointly conducted research entitled "Integrated Ground Penetrating Radar and Deep Learning Approach for Rebar Diameter Classification in Concrete Elements."

Proposed Framework and Deep Learning Integration

This study proposes a framework that adopts non-destructive techniques, integrating Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) with deep learning to automate rebar detection and analysis in concrete elements. The framework consists of four stages: dataset creation, dataset processing, Steel Rebar Detection Model, and Transfer Learning. Different deep learning models (Faster R-CNN, YOLO v7, YOLO v8) are tested, and the results show that the YOLO v8 model outperforms the other two models in terms of accuracy and efficiency.

Key Findings and Accuracy Results

The selected YOLO v8 model is trained on experimental and site data, and tested on real building data. It achieves an overall accuracy of 97.2% for rebar diameters (Ø12, Ø16, Ø18, Ø20) after multiple training iterations, with high accuracy for each diameter class. Integrating GPR with deep learning can significantly enhance the accuracy and efficiency of rebar detection in structural assessments, offering substantial practical value in ensuring the structural integrity and safety of buildings.

Access the Full Study

The paper "Integrated ground penetrating radar and deep learning approach for rebar diameter classification in concrete elements" is authored by Mostafa KHEDR, Mahmoud METAWIE, and Mohamed MARZOUK. Full text of the paper: https://link.springer.com/journal/11709

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of AZoAi.
Post a new comment
Post

Sign in to keep reading

We're committed to providing free access to quality science. By registering and providing insight into your preferences you're joining a community of over 1m science interested individuals and help us to provide you with insightful content whilst keeping our service free.

or

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
AI Moderation Systems Show Striking Inconsistencies In Detecting Hate Speech