Passive-Aggressive Algorithms and SVMs Lead in Fake News Detection, But Challenges Persist

Researchers introduce a novel ChatGPT-generated dataset, revealing both the strengths of current ML models and the hurdles they face in combating AI-generated misinformation.

Twenty most common words from ChatGPT-generated dataset. Research: Are Strong Baselines Enough? False News Detection with Machine Learning.Twenty most common words from ChatGPT-generated dataset. Research: Are Strong Baselines Enough? False News Detection with Machine Learning.

In a paper published in the journal Future Internet, researchers studied automatic false news detection using machine learning (ML) and natural language processing (NLP) techniques by experimenting with four datasets and 10 ML methods. They found that passive-aggressive algorithms, support vector machines (SVM), and random forests (RF) were most effective in detecting false news. However, the study also highlighted that the performance of these algorithms varied significantly depending on the dataset used, particularly when different datasets were used for training and testing, which led to a decrease in accuracy.

The study also underscored the need for more complex models to detect multi-level or computer-generated false news. While linear models like passive-aggressive algorithms and SVMs performed well, the researchers noted that more advanced models, such as BERT and RoBERTa, might be required to handle the increasing sophistication of AI-generated content. Their results provided satisfactory answers to the initial research questions.

Background

Past work on false news detection explored various types of misleading information and the growing challenges advanced tools like chat generative pre-trained transformers (ChatGPT) pose in generating convincing false content.

The researchers pointed out that the complexity and diversity of AI-generated content, as well as the over-reliance on certain datasets in previous studies, can significantly affect the generalizability of false news detection models.

One of the primary obstacles in false news detection is the ever-increasing complexity of material generated by artificial intelligence (AI), which makes it more difficult to discern authentic news.

Additionally, the rapid spread of such content through social media platforms amplifies the difficulty of timely detection.

The study emphasized that these challenges are exacerbated when models are trained on one type of dataset but tested on another, leading to notable drops in accuracy and increased rates of false positives and negatives.

Previous research's dependence on certain datasets also restricts the detection models' resilience in various real-world situations.

False News Detection

On reviewing prior research and datasets for automated false news detection, various techniques, such as SVM for satirical news detection, deep learning for stance detection, and ensemble models like extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), have been explored previously.

The study also mentioned that while effective in some instances, ensemble methods might struggle with false positives and negatives, particularly when dealing with diverse datasets.

Past studies have also addressed challenges like model scalability and adaptability, examined linguistic cues in false news, and developed techniques to detect generated text and user interactions linked to hoaxes.

These insights contributed to the development of more effective false news detection strategies. However, the researchers highlighted that these methods often rely on limited datasets, potentially reducing their effectiveness in broader applications.

Earlier work utilized multiple datasets, such as linguistic inquiry and word count (LIAR), FakeNewsNet, and Twitter15, for analyzing false news detection.

The LIAR dataset consists of manually labeled short statements, while FakeNewsNet includes news articles and user interaction data. Twitter15 focuses on detecting rumors from Twitter posts.

In the current study, the experimenters used a novel dataset generated with ChatGPT, containing artificially created false news and real news sourced from reliable outlets like Reuters. This dataset introduces more diversity, covering global topics such as economics, sports, and medicine, addressing the overrepresentation of U.S. political news in existing datasets. These datasets are crucial in testing the performance of models in handling both real and artificially generated false news..

The study employed CountVectorizer and term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF) for feature extraction, which produced a bag-of-words model to transform text into numerical features for ML.

A range of algorithms was applied for classification, including RF, Naive Bayes (NB), logistic regression (LR), and SVM, all of which have succeeded in prior false news detection tasks. RF, an ensemble method, generates multiple decision trees (DT) to predict the most likely class, while NB, using Bayes' theorem, is ideal for smaller datasets.

LR predicts binary outcomes, SVM separates classes with a hyperplane, and k-nearest neighbors (kNN) classify based on the closest data points.

Advanced methods like multi-layer perceptron (MLP), DT, and boosting algorithms like AdaBoost enhanced the models' performance. MLPs, modeling interconnected layers, solve classification tasks by passing data through layers, while DTs use a hierarchical structure to classify data. Boosting, implemented through AdaBoost, assigns higher weights to misclassified data to improve accuracy.

Stochastic gradient descent (SGD) and passive-aggressive (PA) algorithms, which optimize models by minimizing loss functions, were used for large-scale text classification. These methods, known for their efficiency and strong performance in false news detection, contributed to the overall classification process. However, the study found that the performance of these models varied when applied to different datasets, particularly when cross-dataset testing was involved.

Evaluation Results Summary

Four datasets were used in the experiments to evaluate false news detection methods. The first experiment utilized the Twitter15 dataset, comparing false news and rumors. The classifiers were assessed on accuracy, with passive-aggressive classifiers and SVMs performing best, achieving 87% accuracy. However, the study found that the performance of these models varied when applied to different datasets, particularly when cross-dataset testing was involved.

The second and third experiments tested the LIAR and FakeNewsNet datasets, respectively. For the LIAR dataset, classifiers were evaluated on both six-label and binary classifications.

The results showed that while random forests achieved the highest accuracy in six-label classification, passive-aggressive classifiers and SVMs performed more consistently. Despite this, the study found that using multiple labels significantly decreased the accuracy of the classifiers, suggesting that binary classification might be more effective in certain contexts.

The FakeNewsNet experiments revealed that using datasets from different domains affected accuracy, with the best results obtained when splitting the GossipCop dataset.

The fourth experiment involved the novel ChatGPT-generated dataset, including artificial and real news. The goal of this experiment was to solve the problem of identifying content produced by AI. Classifiers performed well with this dataset, especially passive-aggressive classifiers, which showed consistent results.

Nonetheless, the performance dropped notably when the ChatGPT-generated dataset was used for training and the LIAR dataset for testing, highlighting the challenges of cross-dataset classification and the increasing false positive and negative rates.

Overall, the experiments highlighted the effectiveness of passive-aggressive classifiers and SVMs across different datasets but also underscored challenges in model adaptability and domain specificity.

Conclusion

To sum up, the study effectively evaluated various ML methods for false news detection, highlighting the strengths of passive-aggressive classifiers, SVMs, and random forests. It revealed key characteristics of false news and the differences between human-written and AI-generated news.

The research also introduced a novel ChatGPT-generated dataset for this purpose. The researchers emphasized the need for more sophisticated models, like BERT and RoBERTa, to improve detection capabilities in the face of increasingly complex AI-generated content.  Future work aims to refine these methods and incorporate modern models like bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT) and robustly optimized BERT approach (RoBERTa).

Journal reference:
Silpaja Chandrasekar

Written by

Silpaja Chandrasekar

Dr. Silpaja Chandrasekar has a Ph.D. in Computer Science from Anna University, Chennai. Her research expertise lies in analyzing traffic parameters under challenging environmental conditions. Additionally, she has gained valuable exposure to diverse research areas, such as detection, tracking, classification, medical image analysis, cancer cell detection, chemistry, and Hamiltonian walks.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Chandrasekar, Silpaja. (2024, September 09). Passive-Aggressive Algorithms and SVMs Lead in Fake News Detection, But Challenges Persist. AZoAi. Retrieved on December 12, 2024 from https://www.azoai.com/news/20240909/Passive-Aggressive-Algorithms-and-SVMs-Lead-in-Fake-News-Detection-But-Challenges-Persist.aspx.

  • MLA

    Chandrasekar, Silpaja. "Passive-Aggressive Algorithms and SVMs Lead in Fake News Detection, But Challenges Persist". AZoAi. 12 December 2024. <https://www.azoai.com/news/20240909/Passive-Aggressive-Algorithms-and-SVMs-Lead-in-Fake-News-Detection-But-Challenges-Persist.aspx>.

  • Chicago

    Chandrasekar, Silpaja. "Passive-Aggressive Algorithms and SVMs Lead in Fake News Detection, But Challenges Persist". AZoAi. https://www.azoai.com/news/20240909/Passive-Aggressive-Algorithms-and-SVMs-Lead-in-Fake-News-Detection-But-Challenges-Persist.aspx. (accessed December 12, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Chandrasekar, Silpaja. 2024. Passive-Aggressive Algorithms and SVMs Lead in Fake News Detection, But Challenges Persist. AZoAi, viewed 12 December 2024, https://www.azoai.com/news/20240909/Passive-Aggressive-Algorithms-and-SVMs-Lead-in-Fake-News-Detection-But-Challenges-Persist.aspx.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of AZoAi.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.